
Suspension is the term given to the system of
springs, dampers and linkages that connect the body of the vehicle (the
chassis) to the wheels. For a road car, the suspension is an optimisation of
the vehicle’s handling and ride comfort for the driver. For a race car, it is
maximising the handling and acceleration. The suspension design must be light
weight, cost effective and must provide suitable handling characteristics for
the Class 1 Formula student event. The task for the suspension team is to
design a suitable suspension system incorporating previous teams’ designs to
optimise the car.
After initial research, iterations of the kinematic
design were carried out, with kinematic and dynamic analysis working hand-in-hand.
Once this was set, using steady state hand calculations for the forces, the
components were designed and analysed using FEA. The designs have been
finalised and are ready for manufacture.
The main performance factors of the
suspension system are;
1. Roll centre location has to be along the central
axis of the vehicle and as close to the centre of gravity height as possible, to
reduce jacking and body roll.
2. A balance of Anti-Features; Anti-dive on the front
for improved stability, Anti-squat on the rear for improved acceleration.
Values should not be equal to 0 or 100%.
3. The optimum camber for the tyre used is -3° to 0°.
The camber should be adjustable by +/-2°.
4. Adjustable Toe at the front and rear. +/-2° of
adjustability. Initial settings, Front Toe equal to 0-3° Toe out
5. The driveshaft should be perpendicular to the
vehicle’s centre plane.
6. The rim size will be 13” as market research shows
this is the optimum size. Two sets of tyres for wet and dry conditions
7. The kingpin offset ideally is zero, packaging does
not allow this. The offset should be as small as possible. Average is 5-7°.
8. Front caster should range from 0-3° for
self-centring torque.
9. Spring should be as stiff as possible but allowing
for the specified travel requirements
10. Ride height as low as possible to minimise lateral
load transfer. Must not ‘bottom out’.
11. Roll stiffness is increased by spring and anti-roll
bar stiffness. The distribution of stiffness front:rear is dependent on driver preference. If the roll
stiffness is too stiff the inside rear wheel will be prone to lift.
12. The best damper settings will control the body
motion to keep the car fairly level but allow the suspension to follow the
surface.
13. Minimum wheelbase – 1525mm
14. Smaller Track must be no less that 75% of the
larger track
15. Low frontal area
16. Shorter wheelbase decreases the turning radius of
the vehicle
17. Low un-sprung mass
The proposed budget for the suspension team is
£3380, with large savings coming from sponsorship and machining the components
in-house at the University. If these were outsourced the price would increase
dramatically. Budget restrictions will always be in place and this was no
different with the team and University aiming for a cost of no more than
£16,000.
The final design was developed alongside the
chassis team, to ensure a perfect fit. This was achieved through a cohesive
design process. The geometric model was analysed through the kinematic analysis
and then the dynamic analysis. The components were designed and analysed using
the calculations. This design process is cyclic and had to also work alongside
the chassis team to ensure assembly will be feasible.
|
Parameter |
Front |
Rear |
|
Trackwidth |
1173mm |
1120mm |
|
Wheelbase |
1525mm |
|
|
Camber |
-2° |
-2° |
|
Toe |
+2° |
0° |
|
Wheel and Tyre |
7”/13”x20” ET+49mm |
7”/13”x20” ET+49mm |
|
Caster |
+2° |
-1.5° |
|
Kingpin Inclination |
+7.5° |
+5° |
|
Scrub Radius |
-10mm |
-10mm |
|
Ride Height |
50mm |
|
|
CoG Height |
300mm |
|
|
Anti-roll Bar Stiffness |
5861.397 Nm/rad |
2061.983 Nm/rad |
|
Spring Stiffness |
61400N/m |
98500 N/m |